| [ 3.6.1 - Subsec 201.025(1) ] [ 3.6.2 - Sec 201.025(2) ] |
This section discusses the aspects of the law that specifically apply to employing units liable under FUTA.

| [ Tax Law Manual - TOC ] [ Ch 1 - Employing Unit ] [ Ch 2 - Employment ] [ Ch 3 - Employer ] [ Ch 4 - Taxes ] [ Ch 5 - Reports & Records ] | |
| [ 3.1 - General Definition ] [ 3.2 - Section 201.021 ] [ 3.3 - Successor - Section 201-022 ] [ 3.4 - 501(c)(3) Employer ] [ 3.5 - Employing Unit has Filed an Election ] [ 3.6 - Employing Unit Liable Under FUTA ] [ 3.7 - Political Subdivision Employers ] [ 3.8 - Domestic Employers ] [ 3.9 - Farm and Ranch ] [ 3.10 - Staff Leasing ] [ 3.11 - Termination of Coverage ] [ 3.12 - Alternate Subject Dates ] [ Ch 3 - Index ] | |
Chapter 3: Employer |
comments to: Tax Department |
| [ 3.6.1 - Subsec 201.025(1) ] [ 3.6.2 - Sec 201.025(2) ] |
This section discusses the aspects of the law that specifically apply to employing units liable under FUTA.
"Employer" means: an employing unit
that is liable for the payment of taxes under
the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (26 U.S.C. Section
3301 et seq.) for the current calendar year;
COMMENT: The reference to "current calendar
year" in Section 201.025 means the year
being examined for tax liability. For example,
if the status of the employer is being examined
with respect to 1996, the employer is subject
if it is found that the employer was liable under
the Federal Unemployment Tax Act for 1996 and
is an employing unit in Texas with respect to
that year. The subject date is the later of the
two dates. That is, the date the employer became
subject under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act
and the date he became an employing unit in Texas.
Prior to 1970 an employer subject under Section
201.021 for a given year was liable under the
state law for the following year even though
he did not have qualifying experience in the
second year for the reason that he had to complete
the second year without qualifying experience
in order to be eligible to terminate coverage.
This was not true with respect to liability under
the Federal Unemployment Tax Act since under
that law each year was examined separately with
respect to tax liability. Beginning with 1970,
the Federal law was changed and a taxpayer is
described as one who has qualifying experience
in either the current or the preceding calendar
year. For example, an employer subject under
the Federal Unemployment Tax Act by reason of
qualifying experience in 1996 is subject to the
provisions of the Federal law with respect to
1997 even though he may not have qualifying experience
in 1997.
"Employer" means: an employing unit that
the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (26 U.S.C. Section
3301 et seq.) requires to be an employer under this
subtitle as a condition for approval of this subtitle
for full tax credit against the tax imposed by the
Federal Unemployment Tax Act.
COMMENT: This subsection covers employing units
not otherwise liable who must be covered under
the FUTA. For example, an employer is liable
in Oklahoma under FUTA but does meet Texas criteria.
The employer would be liable under the TUCA by
virtue of being liable under FUTA.
| [ 3.7.1 - Election by the State of Texas ] |
Under Subsection
201.026:
In this subtitle, "employer" also
means a state, a political subdivision of a state,
or an instrumentality of a state or political
subdivision of a state that is wholly owned by
one or more states or political subdivisions
of one or more states.
Comment: All persons performing services for
the State or political subdivision thereof are
in covered employment except those specifically
exempted by Section 201.063 of the Act.
Examples of political subdivisions are county,
city, water district, conservation district,
irrigation district, school district, etc. Mental
health and mental retardation services centers
may be either a part of the state government
or a political subdivision of the state. The
services performed for political subdivisions
of the state were excluded from the definition
of employment until January 1, 1978.
Federal law mandated that all states extend
unemployment insurance coverage to virtually
all employees of the states and their political
subdivisions and instrumentalities.
Section
205.001 -- effective January 1, 1972.
NOTE: Section 205.001 below was amended effective
January 1, 1978, by the 65th Legislature and
is included here only for background concerning
the election of coverage by the State of Texas:
"The State of Texas, a branch or department thereof, or an instrumentality thereof may voluntarily elect (except with respect to a State hospital or a State institution of higher education) coverage as a subject employer for a period of not less than two (2) calendar years and shall for the same period file an election to pay reimbursements for benefits paid as provided in Section 7-A of this Act or to pay contributions as provided in Section 7 of this Act."
Section 205.001(a) now reads:
"A State, a political subdivision of a state, or an instrumentality of a state or a political subdivision of a state may elect to pay reimbursements for benefits instead of contributions."
Comment: The State of Texas exercised this right to become a reimbursing employer (and also waived the exclusion from the definition of employment then provided in Section 201.063) by enactment of Section 29 of the Act, effective January 1, 1972, which provides:
"The State of Texas hereby elects, with respect to all services performed in the employ of this State or any branch or department thereof or any instrumentality thereof which is not otherwise an employer subject to this Act, to become a reimbursing employer subject to this Act, and all services performed in the employ of this State or of any branch or department or instrumentality thereof shall be deemed to constitute employment. This election does not apply to political subdivisions of this State."
Note that coverage applies to all State departments and branches, including instrumentalities of the State, but does not include political subdivisions of the State under Section 29 of the Act.
| [ 3.8.1 - Sec 201.027 ] |
This section discusses the aspects of the law that specifically apply to domestic employers.
Comment: Unless the above conditions are met,
employers already subject under some other provision
of the Act would not be required to report their
domestic service employees. Even though liable
employers should report wages for regular and
domestic service under one account number, liability
under Section 201.027 should be determined independently.
In general, services of a household nature,
in or about a private home, a local college club,
or local chapter of a college fraternity or sorority,
include services rendered by cooks, maids, butlers,
valets, gardeners, and chauffeurs of automobiles
for family use.
On January 1, 1998, the interpretation of domestic
services was broadened.
Work performed in a private home by a baby
sitter, butler, caretaker, chauffeur, companion,
cook, footman, furnaceman, gardener, governess,
groom, handyman, housekeeper, houseman, janitor,
laundress, maid, nursemaid, seamstress, sitter,
waiter, watchman, or valet.